Traditional vulnerability management (VM) often struggles to keep up with the evolving threat landscape due to outdated prioritisation methods, a lack of contextual risk assessment, and the sheer volume of vulnerabilities.
This presentation explored the limitations of traditional vulnerability management approaches, highlighted the advantages of a risk-based approach, and provided practical tips on how to successfully make the transition.
Don’t just react. Get ahead.
Traditional vulnerability management (VM) often struggles to keep up with the evolving threat landscape due to outdated prioritisation methods, a lack of contextual risk assessment, and the sheer volume of vulnerabilities.
This presentation explored the limitations of traditional vulnerability management approaches, highlighted the advantages of a risk-based approach, and provided practical tips on how to successfully make the transition.
Don’t just react. Get ahead.
Traditional vulnerability management (VM) often struggles to keep up with the evolving threat landscape due to outdated prioritisation methods, a lack of contextual risk assessment, and the sheer volume of vulnerabilities.
This presentation explored the limitations of traditional vulnerability management approaches, highlighted the advantages of a risk-based approach, and provided practical tips on how to successfully make the transition.
Don’t just react. Get ahead.