I'm Under Attack
© Copyright Kudelski Security 2025. The Cybersecurity Division of the Kudelski Group

Why Traditional Vulnerability Management Fails: Switching to Risk-Based

This is some text inside of a div block.

Traditional vulnerability management (VM) often struggles to keep up with the evolving threat landscape due to outdated prioritisation methods, a lack of contextual risk assessment, and the sheer volume of vulnerabilities.
This presentation explored the limitations of traditional vulnerability management approaches, highlighted the advantages of a risk-based approach, and provided practical tips on how to successfully make the transition.

Don’t just react. Get ahead.

Our Recent
Achievements

7x recognized in the Gartner’s Market Guide for Managed Detection and Response Services
Bloor logo
Recognized as a Champion with highest innovation score in the Bloor Managed Detection & Response Market Update
Recognized as a Top Managed Security Service Provider (#23 out of 250) in the latest MSSP Alert global ranking

Other Relevant
Quick Reference Guides

Why Traditional Vulnerability Management Fails: Switching to Risk-Based

June 11, 2025
Webinar - Why Traditional Vulnerability Management Fails: Switching to Risk-Based
Kudelski Security needs the contact information you provide to us to contact you about our products and services. You may unsubscribe from these communications at any time. For information on how to unsubscribe, as well as our privacy practices and commitment to protecting your privacy, please review our Privacy Notice.
The recording will be available shortly.
Please revisit this page soon to access it.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Traditional vulnerability management (VM) often struggles to keep up with the evolving threat landscape due to outdated prioritisation methods, a lack of contextual risk assessment, and the sheer volume of vulnerabilities.
This presentation explored the limitations of traditional vulnerability management approaches, highlighted the advantages of a risk-based approach, and provided practical tips on how to successfully make the transition.

Don’t just react. Get ahead.

Short & Clear
Everything you need to know in 45 minutes
Best Practices
Advice through interactive discussion
Interactive
Real time answers

Speakers

Vincent Waart
Global CTEM Leader

Our Recent
Achievements

7x recognized in the Gartner’s Market Guide for Managed Detection and Response Services
Bloor logo
Recognized as a Champion with highest innovation score in the Bloor Managed Detection & Response Market Update
Recognized as a Top Managed Security Service Provider (#23 out of 250) in the latest MSSP Alert global ranking

Other Relevant
Quick Reference Guides

Other Relevant
Webinars

Share on
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Why Traditional Vulnerability Management Fails: Switching to Risk-Based

Traditional vulnerability management (VM) often struggles to keep up with the evolving threat landscape due to outdated prioritisation methods, a lack of contextual risk assessment, and the sheer volume of vulnerabilities.
This presentation explored the limitations of traditional vulnerability management approaches, highlighted the advantages of a risk-based approach, and provided practical tips on how to successfully make the transition.

Don’t just react. Get ahead.

Related video resources